How far out did you go?

As a child I loved the ocean. From the Gulf of Siam, to the Gulf cost the salt water was something that excited me. Even today, sitting on the beach and watching the waves come in from the ocean is a relaxing experience.
I just have this one question.
I’ve touched ocean water everywhere but Africa. Is it possible that salt water I touched in Denmark 30 years ago, would have made its way to Florida and that I touched it again, 30 years later?
How far does one molocue of water travel in 10 years?
I know it seems like a crazy question, but its something I’ve wondered for a long time.

What are you reading?

Lately I seem to be behind the curve when it comes to reading the latest and greatest archiectural theory. Recently I completed a project where I took a blue ocean view built for a customer and tried to build out a technology solution. It wasn’t something that I found a lot of supporting materials for (I suspect there will be eventually). But it got me thinking about hte concept of red oceans and blue oceans.
Recently I had an opportunity to read the book (during a long airline layover). The following are a loose confederation of my thoughts around the book "Blue Ocean Strategy."
  1. I like the overall concept of creating a difference for your company. We’ve called this a lot of things over the years (competitive advantage was always my favorite – although that does kind of violate the tenant of a blue ocean).
  2. The book is an easy read (which is not always the case with Architecture guidance books)
  3. I’ve been thinking about how this applies to the consulting organization I work for. How do you as a consulting group create a blue ocean opportunity? To me that would seem to be the best of both worlds, you could charge more per hour and your customer’s would want to pay that rate (and would secretly even be willing to pay more).

All in all I highly recommend the book. Its a good read and of course, its always useful when you look at things from a new direction.


Architects and Communication

Architects and Communication

Presentation as a skill (or when Architects Present)

Communication as a core skill

Scott Andersen Microsoft Certified Infrastructure Architect

Lewis Carroll must have had a software architect in mind when he created the character The Cheshire Cat in the novel “Alice in Wonderland.” Wonderland was a place filled with change and whimsy where little if anything followed the “rules.” Alice, completely lost comes across the cat sitting in a tree. She asks him for directions. Being a good architect, he asked her where she was going. She didn’t know, so of course the software architect replied – then it doesn’t matter which way you go, does it?

The Cheshire Cat in this scenario displays the architectural principals of asking a follow-on question. The answer given by Alice leaves the Cat no choice but to respond with a useless answer. From asking questions to explaining solutions architects need to communicate. Communication is the skill that helps us translate the vision of tomorrow into the actionable items of the project plan. No matter how good you are at what you do, if you can’t help move a solution in the right direction through communication skills you will struggle as an architect.

As an architect could the Cheshire Cat have asked Alice more questions? Yes of he could have. A good architect would have quickly begun a line of questioning around first where she had come from. Establishing an understanding of the current state can help determine even the most rudimentary direction for a solution. Potentially another line of questioning might involve the expectations for this new “direction.” Having a vision of what to shoot for is a critical skill architects both possess and work on constantly!

Questions and questioning are not the only component of communication. Architects often have a unique position both internally and externally to an organization where they are asked to speak to many different levels of the team. Architects converse with the technical professionals who will implement the solution. Within the architect profession there are multiple types of architect. Enterprise Architects focus on mapping the requirements of the business to overall solutions and capabilities. Infrastructure Architects manage the plumbing of the organization. Solution Architects focus on building new capabilities into the infrastructure. Each has a very specific set of information they require in the conversation. Finally architects have conversations with the business itself.

A Solutions Architect proposing a new ERP solution may present different information about the same solution to many different audiences:

·         What value does this ERP solution has for our business?

·         Does this ERP solution Map to our overall business goals?

·         Does this ERP solution map to our overall technology goals?

·         What are the prerequisites for our infrastructure to deploy this ERP solution?

Each conversation requires a different set of information as well as often a different communication style. For example the business might want a PowerPoint presentation around the value the ERP solution will bring to the organization. They may be looking for analysis around cost savings and process improvements. The infrastructure architect may want to have a conversation around capabilities and the requirements of the solution. This might include technical conversations around bandwidth requirements, security requirements and other technical issues for a solution. The Enterprise Architect will want to have a conversation around how this new ERP solution maps to the overall planned solutions of the future. As architects do we focus enough attention on communication? Or do we fall back to the old adage “your born with it.” Are architects made into communicators or born with communication skills?

Since this paper focuses on the concept of communication, let’s postulate that in fact communicators can be made. But how? Communication is more than tailoring your conversations. It’s the ability to interact with another person on a level where that person feels comfortable. Personally I break communication down into three components. Each of which represents a part of what it takes to be a good communicator.


Everyone hates a bad presentation. Someone once told me that a great presenter can take bad material and make it acceptable. A bad presenter can take good material and make it bad. Presentation is all about understanding the topic that is being presented. More than simply being able to say what you mean in a presentation, a presentation is about being comfortable with process of presenting.

1.       Present

2.       Know your audience

3.       Make it your own

4.       Ask the question

The initial area to help architects improve their communication skills is in the area of presentations. For this we can look to several organizations that were built specifically to improve people’s presentation skills. My personal recommendation has always been to leverage the Toastmaster’s organization. They have chapters in most cities and are a wonderful place to learn the art of presentations. The other part of presentation skills is knowing more than you are presenting. A good rule of thumb is to have 2 hours of material for every hour you intend to present. The first few times this seems painful, but after a few presentations you will end up wishing you had more time, not more information!

Things I can do to improve:

·         Present to someone else – I recommend Toastmasters as a great starting point.

·         Peer reviews of your materials always help make it a stronger presentation!

Know your audience:

Everyone hates a boring speaker who doesn’t pay attention to the audience. Once you’ve mastered that initial presentation style you can now expand your abilities by adding the capacity to measure your audience. People communicate both with words and with body language. One of the hardest things to pick up on is how your audience perceives what it is you are presenting.

1.       Present

2.       Know your audience

3.       Make it your own

4.       Ask the question

How do you teach someone to know their audience? The first thing you need to have is a comfort level in presenting. Once you’re comfortable presenting to an audience you can begin the larger concept of watching the body language of the participants. Often in this scenario you can video tape yourself presenting. Place the camera so that it captures both you and your audience. Watch how the audience reacts to you. The more you understand how the audience reacts to your information the quicker you can adjust to their needs. A quick way to do this is listening. Listening both to the questions the audience is asking as well as to the context and types of questions. If the audience asks multiple questions around a specific point as clarification, go back and talk through that point again the audience may have missed it the first time!

Things I can do to improve:

·         Listen to the questions being asked, clarification questions often mean the audience didn’t get the point the first time.

·         Watch the body language of the audience sometimes this tells you if you are moving to slow or too fast through the material!

Make it your own:

Another component of communication that I find critical is the concept of “making it your own.” It’s easy to memorize facts and use them in conversations. It’s more difficult to take information and present that information in your own style. This concept to me is the crux of communication.

1.       Present

2.       Know your audience

3.       Make it your own

4.       Ask the question

This is the hardest component of communication. The concept comes from martial arts, and is the step beyond memorization. Once you’re past rote presentation you make something your own. In making content your own you are now able to apply your presentation skills, understand the needs of your audience and can now present your information in any format. This is where knowing more than you are presenting helps considerably. You will never run out of information, only time.

Things I can do to improve:

·         Practice, Practice, Practice (need I say more?)

·         Use your own words! Nothing helps you understand a topic then putting it into your own words and reusing that!

Ask the question:

Once you’ve mastered the three components we layer on the fourth and highest level skill required by an architect in the communication space. Asking your audience the follow on questions you need in order to determine the next steps and to clarify the information you are presenting (as well as in the role of active questioning of someone else’s presentation).

1.       Present

2.       Know your audience

3.       Make it your own

4.       Ask the questions

a.       Clarify

b.      Follow on

Let’s examine that initial conversation between the Cat and Alice. What information did Alice really want from the Cat? Did the Cat have that information? Was the Cat the right person to ask the information of? All of these are components of knowing your audience.

Things I can do to improve:

·         Listen, Listen, Listen

·         Lead the audience to where you want them to go.

Clarifying Questions:

As you master that skill you can begin to examine the next step, the clarifying question. A clarification question is relevant to the material being covered and is the initial step towards understanding. Clarifying questions are based on the information presented with the affect of clarifying the message presented. An example of this would be asking Alice “Do you mean you don’t know where you want to be, or you don’t know which way you should go?” It’s critical that a clarifying question be based on information actually presented and should be used as a tool to focus the information.

Follow on questions:

An example of the next tier of questioning is the follow-on question. A follow-on question does not seek to clarify information presented; rather it is intended to push the presentation in a different direction. An example using Alice and the Cat might be the Cat asking Alice “I understand that you don’t know where you want to go right now. But removing that where is it you would like to be, right now?”


It’s critical that as a architect we are able to communicate without the electronic tools so many people use as a crutch. Death by PowerPoint I’ve often heard as a description of a sales or technical event. When the participants in these events walk away later, the sessions they remember are the ones that follow these three simple rules in this document. Anyone can be a good presenter with good material (although some people hide behind PowerPoint). Knowing your audience let’s you focus the materials on what your audience wants and needs to hear. Making it your own allows you to follow the path the audience wants rather than rotely presenting the same information over and over.

Following these four simple steps will improve your communication skills. As you master these communication skills you open the door to many other skills that will help you as an architect. Making the concept you are presenting your own allows you to quickly formulate replies to questions tailored to a specific audience. Knowing the audience helps you tailor your presentation speed, delivery and even if required moving to other topics and sections. Finally being a solid presenter allows you to move away from the crutch that is PowerPoint.

The Cheshire Cat as an architect communicating with Alice leveraged the higher level skill of asking the follow-on question. In knowing his material and having made it their own, he was able to quickly provide Alice with the right answer, based on the information given. The only thing he failed to do, was know his audience. What did Alice really want to know when she asked “which way should I go from here?” Ultimately she wanted to go home.

How far out do you go?

Architects (software for sure, building also I suspect) often think two and three years out from where they are now. It is often easier to see what is coming, then to determine the what of what you are standing on.
So what is the horizon? I’ve had people tell me that you can’t look beyond 18 months because frankly technology changes so much. But that’s not really true. Technology in and of itself always reveals what is next, in what we are using right now. Television has advanced to the point where DVR’s (which were high end items five years ago) are now common place.
Taking the known (DVR) technology and pushing that out two years from now, what would the next generation DVR look like?
1. Cheaper (advertisers pay a portion of the cost of the DVR – so that you can’t actually fast forward through the ads).
2. Easier interface that you can control remotely (like Slingboxes today).
3. DVR only events (again advertisers provide this as a service)
But is two years enough? Today there are devices that can act as portal DVR’s (you can use them to record tv in your home, and take them with you on the road as well).
By focusing only on the DVR we limit the view of what might be coming. If we broaden the view we can take the opportunity to stretch out to see what might be around the corner.
DVR’s as a function of the telelvision (integrated).
Live TV dying. Direct broadcast to internet sites that you then download and watch when you can. Beyond on demand!
While this discussion was just me playing with what might be, it still brings up the topic of how and what of viewing the future. Its what Archtiect’s do (software) at least the good ones do. There are many architects down in the weeds of operation and other specific specialities that lose the ability quickly to see where things are heading.
But it is a core concept, build on the known. But always look to the future.

Sunny days and summer weather

Yesterday was the first day of summer.
Little bunnies that weren’t here last year are running across my yard. Flowers are blowing (at least the ones that didn’t start too early are:-)
And I find myself warming up. Warming up to thoughts of fishing and golf. Warming up to playing catch in the front year with my children.
Lately I wonder if we shouldn’t move to someplace that is warmer. I like being a warm weather father. I hate going out in the snow. I hate being cold (although I hate being warm as well).
Maybe I should move someplace where it is 72 degrees year round (which would be a climate controlled house of course 😉

Rambling thoughts on hump day

So let’s start with the obvious one. Why is wednesday hump day? Certainly that is a modern affectation, as in the past people worked 6 and 7 days a week just to survive.
So why hump day? (sorry folks – today no answers just lots of questions.)
Why is it there are 300 web sites devoted to college athletic recruiting when in theory only the athletes and the schools should be invovled?
Why is it that everyone rates these athletes before they come into college?
Why is it that airport parking lots never seem full?
Yet the parking lot I use in Downtown Indianapolis is often full?
Why do we get nervous when a truck pulls up next to us on the highway?
Why is the cutting edge more fun becuase it can often be the bleeding edge?
Why do some people stay in the same place forever?

what bothers me today

We’ve passed out of yesterday’s world holocaust day. That is a day that always depresses me. There are so many bad things that have happened in this world, and we only have 365 days in the year to mark those events. I think we should start limiting events to an hour or less that way we can sqeeze more events into a single day.
In remembering the horror that occured in Nazi Germany we also need to remember the other horrors that occured, some at the exact same time, others before and after.
1. 1880’s to 1890’s People driven out of their homes by rampaging Cossaks in Russia.
2. People dying by the thousands in Ireland as the farming system collasped. Mass exodeus to the US by Irish people.
3. Russia, we will never know how many peopel Joseph Stalin actually killed.
4. Russia, we will never know how many people dies during the revolution.
5. Cambodia, ditto Russia – we will never know how many people Pol Pot actually killed.
6. Africa – just look look there are horrible things happening all the time.
7. The Middle east – getting worse and worse.
Is it worse to forget history and be doomed to repeat it? Or to remember history and wonder how you can help stop it?

More thoughts around Cal Ripken and others

So I’ve been thinking about my post of yesterday. It revovles around a conversation my best friend and I have been having for over 20 years now. (and we’ve come no closer to solving it – so I am sharing it).
When we were kids, and I admit I grew up in the media reduced 60’s and 70’s so the glare and spotlight were not shined on the private lives (and off field activies) of athletes. We as kids imortalized the athletes we watched. Bart Starr, Walter Payton were names that to me represented both great people (which they both are) as well as great athletes (which they both were).
Charles Barkley once said he was not a role model, but Walter Payton, Bart Starr and many others were role models. Men who worked hard and played a game they loved for fans they loved.
They played for one team. They played for the fans of one city.
But now, athetes are less admired then they were. Part of it is glare of the spotlight (ESPN – 24 hours of sports) generated by a massive influx of media sources.
But I think part of it is that athlete’s have forgotten how lucky they are. I don’t care how great anyone is, any athlete is one knee injury away from being average. We all are – there are things that can happen that will in fact make all of us average.
Ultimately I miss the days when I could idolize an athlete without performing a complete background check. And there are many athletes today who would pass that test. The thing is, we never hear about that. We never hear about the giving, only the taking that is done. Where once our athletes were idolized, now they are more stylized.
As my best friend and I have discussed, when did we stop. The why we stopped is pretty clear – you see it in front of you ever day. It’s the what that bothers me. We once had heros.
I still love sports. The beauty of sports is watching the mechanics of someone, knowing that physically they are doing something you can’t do. The thing that is missing for me is the hero, the person that you could model your life after. To paraphrase the song from the 80’s, "we need  a hero."
While I realize that my personal reaction to the change in sports is insignificant as is my person attempt to boycott all professional sporting events, I need someone to root for.
When I was little I had dozens of players to choose from. To me now it feels like there are so few.

Cal Ripken

I recently read an article about Cal Ripken Jr. I was always a fan of Mr. Ripken when he was playing. His honesty, dedication and sheer love of the game was always a joy to watch and enjoy.
I followed his streak for years, in the early days when he not only never missed a game, he even seldom missed an inning. Then later on when he got close to the Iron Man record I followed even closer.
I am not a Baltimore fan, never will be. But I was a Cal Ripken Jr. fan.
Since baseball Mr. Ripken has become like the rest of us, going to our regular jobs and doing the same thing everyday. I have to say that I think I admire him more now then I did as a player. His candor, honesty and love of baseball is something that I think we should applaud. He enters the hall of fame this year, but I think  we need to do something more.
Cal Ripken represents the part of baseball that I loved as a child. I was never a good baseball player. But I love the honesty (and Bull Durham fans – the Geometry) of the game. Baseball is a game of straight lines not curves and Mr. Ripken you represent one of the straightest lines baseball ever had.
I guess my call to action would be to make sure Mr. Ripken knows that his love of baseball, his honesty and dedication and honor will win him entrance to more than the Baseball Hall of Fame.
Thanks Mr. Ripken. You gave me many summers of enjoyment!

From here to there

On the telephone we ask "are you there."
that we are not here.
Yet asking, in knowing we are not here
why then do we not infer we are there?
So quietly
I say
"we are not there, we are here"
to the silence on the other end
which leaves confused silence
and confusion
a changing
"can I speak with…"
which answered
from here to there
is "can you speak?"
more silence
more rustling
until others intervence
and the here
and there
merge into a chatter
of like sounds and bells.
and I am left wondering
if we are here
and not there
then why, when others are not here
but there
do they ask are you there?